Skip to main content

DeSemler: The Lighthorsemen (1987)

 


On October 31, 1917, in the third year of the Great War, two regiments of Australian Lighthorsemen charged the Turkish defenses of Beersheba in Palestine. with bayonets in their hands, they galloped against machine guns, rifles, and artillery in an eleventh hour attempt to save the attacking British army from disaster. This is the story of some of the men and horses who rode into legend that day.

Simon Wincer’s The Lighthorsemen (1987) is a wonderful film I’ve watched twice before and barely remembered, and after a third viewing its hold remains tenuous. The 1980s was a decade of big nationalistic swings in Australian cinema, some of which missed—The Lighthorsemen, Burke & Wills—while others struck a chord and remain widely liked—Gallipoli, The Man from Snowy River, and Phar Lap, also directed by Wincer. It’s hardly a radical act of film criticism to note that some films are stickier than others, and that the stickier ones tend to survive the Darwinian struggle for celluloid longevity. Going into this third viewing of The Lighthorsemen, I was curious to discern what makes this film fade fast while a film like Gallipoli—also set during the First World War and dabbling in similar themes—seems to remain evergreen.

Setting aside contextual considerations and also matters of craft—both films showcase some of the best work of their respective filmmakers and crews—Gallipoli has two notable aces over The Lighthorsemen: an archetypal hero’s journey (which veers in its final act into tragedy) giving it a purity of focus, and a genuine movie star alongside the hero. Mark Lee’s journey from his family farm to the battlefield at Gallipoli is not unlike Mark Hamill’s journey as Luke Skywalker in Star Wars from his family’s moisture farm on Tatooine to facing down the might of the Empire. And just as Hamill/Skywalker’s earnest lead is garnished with the special sauce of an embryonic movie star in Harrison Ford/Han Solo, so too does Mel Gibson fulfill that function in Gallipoli; it’s understandable that the film sets Lee aside in its second act to follow Gibson through military training. In contrast, the more rudimentary The Lighthorsemen has several nominal leads—young cavalrymen in the Light Horse Brigade tasked with capturing Beersheba—none attaining archetypal status and none played by movie stars.

I say this not to fault the dutiful cast, including Peter Phelps and Gary Sweet—both good actors whose presence in Australian film and television has only enriched it—nor the late Jon Blake, a promising actor whose career was cut tragically short by an automobile accident and resulting disability. Nor do I write this to fault screenwriter Ian Jones, who previously co-wrote the Tony Richardson/Mick Jagger Ned Kelly. Jones’ script lacks Gallipoli’s purity of focus and David Williamson’s touch with dialogue— its historian’s imprint is seen in lengthy exposition scenes that arrest the story momentum—but is nonetheless ambitious in scope and thoughtful. And as mentioned, Wincer and the crew deliver generally strong work, with occasional faults such as rapid scene fades that suggest cutting for television. The crew includes DP Dean Semler, whose photography here is outstanding. Where his work on Razorback was deliberately stylized and all about obscuring its inanimate boar, Semler's work here is all clarity and cleanliness. From its opening scene of army stockmen herding wild horses in lush green country to the epic finale with cavalry charging across the parched Palestinian desert, Semler’s images are frequently stunning, made all the more impressive by the number of ingredients captured: motion, horses, pyrotechnics, dust etc.

And yet, the absence of a cleanly delineated hero and/or movie star occupying the frame—a Gibson in The Road Warrior, a Kidman in Dead Calm, a Costner in Dances with Wolves—means those images aren’t quite as sticky and resonant. They don’t etch as deep. It’s a telling illustration of the sheer, tangible value-add of a movie star in connecting with audiences.

Ben 

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Innocence (1989)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Director:  Scott Murray Stars:  Katia Caballero, Keith Smith Scott Murray is one of the premier commentators on Australian cinema. He’s best known as editor and contributor to  Cinema Papers  and  Senses of Cinema , as well as for editing, authoring, and contributing to various volumes on Australian film, including one particularly indispensable resource for my work on Down Under Flix,  Australian Film 1978–1994 . In the 1980s, Murray directed the film  Beyond Innocence , also known as  Devil in the Flesh . It was both his theatrical feature debut and swansong, though he’d later helm a music documentary,  Massenet: His Life and Music . 

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...