Skip to main content

Adeptly Adapted: Roxanne (1987), The Drover’s Wife (2021)

 


Both Leah Purcell’s The Drover’s Wife (2021) and Fred Schepisi’s Roxanne (1987) are drawn from theatrical progenitors: the former a play penned by director-writer-star Purcell herself, the latter Edmond Rostand’s French play Cyrano de Bergerac. Moreover, both features are somewhat shrewd updates of late 1800s source material: Rostand’s play was first performed in 1897, whilst Purcell’s 21st century play was adapted from Henry Lawson’s 1892 short story of the same name.

Roxanne is a contemporary retelling and American transplant of Rostand’s play. The larger-than-life soldier poet Cyrano of the play-text is now silver-haired, silver-tongues fireman C.D., played by writer-star Steve Martin: more grounded than Rostand’s heroic character, but still afflicted with a gigantic nose. As per the beats of the play, C.D. falls in love with the beautiful Roxanne (Darryl Hannah) but is enlisted to help marble-mouthed Chris (Rick Rossovich) to woo her.

The role of Cyrano scored Jose Ferrer an Oscar in 1950, Gerard Depardieu an Oscar nomination in 1990, and SHOULD have scored Peter Dinklage a nomination in 2021 (for Joe Wright’s musical adaptation) and Martin nominations for Actor and Screenplay for Roxanne. This film is charming and witty and showcases some of its star’s best work, in an era that was largely great work, preceded by Three Amigos and Little Shop of Horrors, followed by Planes, Trains and Automobiles, Dirty Rotten Scoundrels, and Parenthood. Though I’d be hard pressed not to call Martin the overriding auteur and creative force of the picture, there are several noteworthy tools in Australian director Schepisi’s arsenal that I think cannot be discounted. Firstly, his deftness with adapting dialogue-driven theatrical material, as evidenced by his adaptations of Plenty and Six Degrees of Separation. Secondly, his deft handling of other dominant star voices on later comedies: John Cleese on Fierce Creatures and the Douglases on It Runs in the Family. Thirdly, the filmmaker’s sharp sense of tone and pacing, which keep Roxanne humming along beautifully.

 


Like Martin, Purcell is a strong self-generator of material. And much as I’m predisposed to liking Roxanne based on my affection for Martin and other adaptations of his source, as a long-time admirer of both Purcell and of Henry Lawson’s short story—indisputably one of the best works of short Australian fiction—I was predisposed to liking The Drover’s Wife. However, as it stands, I admired Purcell’s film more than I liked it. A loose adaptation or free variation on the source story, this revisionist take on Lawson’s colonial era work maintains the original setting, but updates the source ideologically and expands upon its plot significantly. Where Lawson’s story focuses squarely on the implicitly white wife of a drover contending with a snake to protect her family, here the lead, essayed onscreen by Purcell, is Indigenous and rearing mixed race children, and must contend with not only natural but human foes, along with the misogyny and racism they wield. Purcell plays the title role with conviction, and her direction is muscular and robust, but ultimately The Drover’s Wife is, for me at least, dramatically unsatisfying: its narrative pivots and ideological ends—all sympathetic—ultimately prove somewhat obvious and predictable.

Ben

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Innocence (1989)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Director:  Scott Murray Stars:  Katia Caballero, Keith Smith Scott Murray is one of the premier commentators on Australian cinema. He’s best known as editor and contributor to  Cinema Papers  and  Senses of Cinema , as well as for editing, authoring, and contributing to various volumes on Australian film, including one particularly indispensable resource for my work on Down Under Flix,  Australian Film 1978–1994 . In the 1980s, Murray directed the film  Beyond Innocence , also known as  Devil in the Flesh . It was both his theatrical feature debut and swansong, though he’d later helm a music documentary,  Massenet: His Life and Music . 

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...