Skip to main content

Molly (1983)

 


Ned Lander’s Molly (1983) was a journey. I went from begrudgingly liking Molly, to wanting to begrudgingly like Molly, to begrudgingly watching Molly and actively wanting it to end over the course of its short but at times ceaseless 90-minute runtime.

Not to be confused with the Samuel Johnson-starring miniseries of the same name about Australian pop commentator Molly Meldrum, Lander’s Molly instead focuses on the titular singing dog who befriends  Maxine (Claudia Karvan, age circa 10-11, in her film debut), a young girl who recently lost her mother. Molly’s particular set of skills attract the nefarious, Svengalian intentions of Jones (Garry McDonald), a disgruntled former-entertainer-turned-cook who dognaps Molly with aspirations of reviving his own thwarted career.

The above description paints Molly as an amiable goofy family film, and at times it is. Going into Molly, there are multiple component parts I like: I like dogs, singing or otherwise; I like Claudia Karvan across the breadth of her impressive career (including High Tide, The Big Steal, Dating the Enemy, and 33 Postcards); I like Garry McDonald in some roles, particularly alongside his Mother and Son sparring partner Ruth Cracknell, who also appears in Molly (that show would debut on ABC the following year); and I like the early 80s Sydney milieu in which much of the film takes place.

There are some films whose pleasurable component parts flesh out and/or carry the flimsiest of bones. Molly has the odd distinction of being similarly threadbare and bloated, with drawn-out, meandering shot lengths and, in the film’s second half, interminable circus scenes after Maxine and Molly befriend a group of acrobats. When Cecil B. DeMille's The Greatest Show on Earth debuted in 1952, its excesses were forgivable given their novelty. Despite the talent of the performers and, I suppose, their novelty in the burgeoning Australian cinema of the time, to my impatient modern eyes these sequences arrest Molly dead.

Still, the dog's indisputably a star.

Ben

 

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Innocence (1989)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Director:  Scott Murray Stars:  Katia Caballero, Keith Smith Scott Murray is one of the premier commentators on Australian cinema. He’s best known as editor and contributor to  Cinema Papers  and  Senses of Cinema , as well as for editing, authoring, and contributing to various volumes on Australian film, including one particularly indispensable resource for my work on Down Under Flix,  Australian Film 1978–1994 . In the 1980s, Murray directed the film  Beyond Innocence , also known as  Devil in the Flesh . It was both his theatrical feature debut and swansong, though he’d later helm a music documentary,  Massenet: His Life and Music . 

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...