Skip to main content

Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F (2024)

 


A couple of months after watching Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F, I learned the film’s director was Australian. My earlier lack of inquisitiveness about the film’s director reflects a) the anonymity of its direction and b) Eddie Murphy’s default status as overriding auteur of the production. While Murphy has directed only one feature (Harlem Nights) and did not care for the experience, he's written numerous vehicles for himself and been the dominant authorial voice on many of his own projects. Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F is clearly a personal reclamation project, making up for the disappointment of Beverly Hills Cop III—largely of his own making—and of a piece with his other recent streaming-only releases (including fellow sequel Coming 2 America), a stratagem—much like Adam Sandler—for maintaining the veneer of superstardom without testing box office pull in the marketplace.

Lest I sound cynical, there’s a degree of thoughtfulness and pathos to the character etching in Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F, much like that other Jerry Bruckheimer-produced lega-sequel of late, Top Gun: Maverick. Like Maverick, Foley has aged without growing, which makes him simultaneously wildcard, throwback, and retrograde. It’s a pleasure seeing Murphy revisit this material, with welcome but deferential turns from co-stars old (Reinhold, Ashton, Reiser, Pinchot, that signature Harold Faltermeyer tune) and new (Kevin Bacon, Joseph Gordon-Levitt, and especially Taylour Paige).

And lest I sound disparaging, former commercial director Mark Molloy’s helming is polished, professional journeyman work, albeit beholden to the aesthetic constraints of Netflix and never testing its auteur-star’s comfort zone. Ultimately, his work here is in the same vein as Patrick Hughes's on The Expendables 3 and The Hitman's Bodyguard series. It’s nonetheless striking that its three predecessors were all directed by name (or soon to be name) directors in Martin Brest, Tony Scott, and John Landis. Of course, of those productions, only the first two I’d call true collaborations, and only the second was directed with any visual panache. Landis grouses that Murphy refused to play for comedy in Beverly Hills Cop III, deeming that Axel has become a grown-up, to the film’s detriment. I don’t doubt Landis was railroaded by his star, though in the same book Landis claims Oscar didn’t work (a lie!) because Sylvester Stallone wasn’t funny enough; as much as I appreciate Landis, when one star fails to be funny that’s unfortunate, when two fail to be funny maybe you’re the problem. Whatever the case, Murphy chose to be funny for Beverly Hills Cop: Axel F, and Mark Molloy probably had something to do with it, but also probably couldn’t have done much if he hadn’t.

Ben

Popular posts from this blog

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...
Read more

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...
Read more

John Hargreaves double feature: Hoodwink (1981) and Sky Pirates (1986)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Discounting the film  Blackfellas , in which he plays a minor role as a racist policeman, I’m surprised it’s taken this long to cover any John Hargreaves films on Down Under Flix. A six time AFI Award nominee (including for  Hoodwink ) and triple winner, Hargreaves is one of the best leading men to emerge from the Australian New Wave, and I have particular regard for his work in  Don’s Party,   Long Weekend , and  The Odd Angry Shot . Hargreaves was a natural performer: gifted and charismatic, but not unnecessarily flashy; handsome, but not movie star handsome, and slightly crumpled like a creased jacket. He was a quintessential Australian everyman ala Jack Thompson and Bryan Brown, though he’s less familiar to young filmgoers today, partly due to his untimely passing in 1996 at age 50. This article looks at one of Hargreaves’ best films… and one of his other films… 
Read more