Skip to main content

The Poster Maketh the Film? Now Add Honey (2015) and Any Questions for Ben? (2012)


Bad posters are a dime a dozen, but bad comedy posters are legion. They’re not hard to spot, typically featuring actors engaged in decontextualised mugging against bland, often plain white backgrounds, desperate to please and spread joy. And the red text … so much red text …


 

But a poorly-postered comedy can rise above the station of its ropey advertising. Though spared the red text and white backdrops, here are two Australian comedies with unflattering posters that rise above their middling promotions.



Now Add Honey (2015)

Director: Wayne Hope

Starring: Robyn Butler, Portia De Rossi, Lucy Fry, Lucy Durack, Hamish Blake

Now Add Honey is a film I knew next to nought about, besides it featuring a handful of familiar faces (Angus Sampson, Portia De Rossi, Hamish Blake, David Field) and being an Australian comedy with a bad poster promising young vs old, spunk vs frump, and other forms of comedic culture clash. Caroline (Robyn Butler, also responsible for the script) is a frustrated matriarch whose husband (Richard Morgan) is distant, oldest daughter (Philippe Coulthard) is going through teenage doldrums, youngest daughter (Lucinda Armstrong) is obsessed with children’s entertainer Monkey Girl, and younger sister (Lucy Durack) and her fiancée (Blake) are wedding-obsessed. So far, so middle class. Enter niece Honey (Lucy Fry), abovementioned children’s entertainer Monkey Girl, and her unravelling stage mother Beth (De Rossi), returning from America to rekindle family discontent. When Beth is arrested over a booty of prescription drugs in her luggage, Caroline is tasked with managing her niece, whose pampered upbringing and impending transition from children’s megastar to saucy pop stardom lead to all manner of hijinks.

Comparison to two other poorly-postered Australian comedies that take jabs at the entertainment industry, The Wannabes and The Flip Side, is instructive in elucidating Now Add Honey’s merits: nobody embarrasses themselves here on the same monumental scale as The Wannabes, and the entertainment industry milieu of the film feels much more realised than the barely sketched world and toothless parody of The Flip Side. I may well have ongoing Australian comedy Stockholm syndrome after a jam-packed month of comedies in the early days of Down Under Flix—an anthropological undertaking that encompassed rom coms, small town comedies, musical comedies, the abovementioned Wannabes, and distinguished others—but I enjoyed Now Add Honey despite finding it only sporadically amusing. Like Tommy Lee Jones, I find it hard to sanction the buffoonery, but the ensemble—especially Butler, Fry, and De Rossi—throw themselves into said buffoonery with such enthusiasm that their commitment goes some way to winning me over, and writer Butler and director Wayne Hope (star of BoyTown) - both comedy stalwarts - juggle the film’s various threads and subplots well, weaving them together effectively at film’s end.


Any Questions for Ben? (2012)

Director: Rob Sitch

Starring: Josh Lawson, Rachael Taylor, Daniel Henshall, Felicity Ward, Christian Clark, Lachy Hulme, Rob Sitch

In contrast to Now Add Honey, a film I had little context for on first viewing, I had plenty of context for Any Questions for Ben?, and not just the shared nomenclature. I like Josh Lawson’s work in Becoming Bond, where he plays former 007 George Lazenby with empathy and wit. I’m a fan of Rachel Taylor’s work in Red Dog and Ladies in Black, and her supporting stint on Marvel’s Jessica Jones. And I admire director Rob Sitch and the Working Dog team’s debut and sophomore films, The Castle and The Dish, two fairly unimpeachable Australian comedy classics. Like Yahoo Serious, their feature film career is three and done, with the third film following a number of years after their initial hits and perceived as a disappointment. But just as Serious’s swansong Mr Accident is more inventive and fun than its reputation (or, more pointedly, lack thereof) suggests, Any Questions for Ben? is better than its derided reputation (or lack thereof) implies. The poster, fittingly enough, is what turned me off seeing the film at the time of its release, conveying the personality and charm of a pricey, finely burnished stock photo, with a title that proved head-scratching outside the context of the film.

While there’s merit and logic to measuring a film by the yardstick of its director’s earlier work, doing so sometimes reveals more about the audience and their entitlement than it does the work itself. While I don’t want to make this review another reclamation project for a film ill-treated by critics (as per my recent review of Where the Green Ants Dream), I’ll say that those who measured Any Questions for Ben? unfairly in light of The Castle and The Dish—lamenting the absence of an endearing elder statesman in the lead and a community of likeable misfits around him with their own recognisable patter and quirks—neglected the film’s interesting character portrait of twentysomething professional & personal crossroads, and the transposition of said community of endearing misfits with recognisable quirks and patter into a new context. It’s true that there’s a shift from universality to specificity from The Castle to Any Questions for Ben?—the former a celebration of family and home in the broadest sense, the latter laser-focused on an affluent early-careerist questioning his choices despite his preposterous success—and by definition the latter won’t be as accessible to all. But if as moviegoers we can roll with the events of, say, Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings, some leeway can be afforded to an affectionate portrait of executive class ennui, even coming from the nation’s foremost affectionate chroniclers of Aussie battler fun-times.

The titular Ben (Lawson) is a marketing executive whose speciality is engineering hugely successful brand campaigns and then getting out of dodge. He’s had multiple jobs in a short span of years, as well as living in multiple rentals and being in multiple short-term relationships. Life is fast-paced, exciting, but hollow. When he attends a career’s evening at his former high school and receives zero questions from the audience (the source of the title) he begins to question his transient life choices, and the appearance of an old crush, Alex (Taylor), fans the flame of a quarter life crisis.

While it lacks the sheer quotability of Working Dog’s earlier films—in fairness, few Australian films are as quotable as The Castle—their filmmaking has grown from feature to feature. There’s a surface technical flair and flash to Any Questions for Ben? that’s a world beyond the rudimentary craft of their cozy debut feature—perhaps fitting for a film about a branding guru—and a production scale that’s impressive in the genre of Australian comedy - again fitting given the subject matter. Melbourne is shot exceptionally well and has rarely looked better on film, or in real life. The film doubles as a love letter of sorts to the city, long a hub for Australian comedy talent.

As mentioned, the patented Working Dog ensemble of misfits is present, albeit transposed to an urban setting and nicely played by Daniel Henshall (an amiable contrast to his work in Snowtown), Lachy Hulme (Macbeth, Let’s Get Skase), Felicity Ward, and Christian Clark. Ben’s arc is perceptively handled and Lawson is alternately appealing and infuriating, as he should be. Given her long stretches offscreen, the role of Alex skirts dangerously close to becoming a fantasy object of affection, but Sitch and co smartly address this within the screen story—having Alex object to Ben’s idealising of her—and Taylor provides shading and dimension to the character.

As of writing, Any Questions for Ben? stands as Sitch and Working Dog’s feature swansong, a status I hope is remedied in future (though they remain industrious in television). It also serves as proof, as does Now Add Honey, that a ropey poster does not a ropey movie make … though it doesn’t do it any favours persuading punters to part with their hard-earned shekels.

Ben

Popular posts from this blog

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...

John Hargreaves double feature: Hoodwink (1981) and Sky Pirates (1986)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Discounting the film  Blackfellas , in which he plays a minor role as a racist policeman, I’m surprised it’s taken this long to cover any John Hargreaves films on Down Under Flix. A six time AFI Award nominee (including for  Hoodwink ) and triple winner, Hargreaves is one of the best leading men to emerge from the Australian New Wave, and I have particular regard for his work in  Don’s Party,   Long Weekend , and  The Odd Angry Shot . Hargreaves was a natural performer: gifted and charismatic, but not unnecessarily flashy; handsome, but not movie star handsome, and slightly crumpled like a creased jacket. He was a quintessential Australian everyman ala Jack Thompson and Bryan Brown, though he’s less familiar to young filmgoers today, partly due to his untimely passing in 1996 at age 50. This article looks at one of Hargreaves’ best films… and one of his other films…