Skip to main content

Macbeth (2006)



Published 2016 on Down Under Flix

Director: Geoffrey Wright
Stars: Sam Worthington, Victoria Hill, Gary Sweet, Lachy Hulme
It’s fascinating that in the short space of ten years, two Australian filmmakers have adapted William Shakespeare’s Macbeth. While the Bard’s play is an all-timer, and has been adapted in the past by master directors like Orson Welles, Akira Kurosawa, and Roman Polanski, film adaptations haven’t exactly been abundant. So the fact that two Australians would choose to steer it to the screen less than a decade apart is a weird anomaly, though not inexplicable. One could conjecture at length about the 400+ year old “Scottish” play’s relevance to contemporary Australian identity, the timelessness of its depiction of ambition, greed, conspiracy, regicide, guilt, and hubris… but really, it’s just a terrific, badass piece of source material.
I really wanted to like Justin Kurzel’s 2015 adaptation of Macbeth starring Michael Fassbender. Kurzel’s a very good filmmaker – his 2011 film Snowtown, about the murders that transpired in the South Australian town of the same name, is exceptional – and I like that he committed to a very particular take on the source. I just wasn’t a fan of that relentlessly gridmark take. I also can’t help but question the casting of Marion Cotillard as Lady Macbeth: she’s a tremendous actress, but also possibly the least Scottish person on the planet, and that planet includes Jackie Chan, Deepak Chopra and Usain Bolt.  
2006’s Macbeth, from Romper Stomper director Geoffrey Wright, is much more my speed. I first caught this film back during its theatrical release, and in the intervening decade had forgotten how much fun it is. Co-written by Wright and Lady Macbeth herself, Victoria Hill, the film preserves the Bard’s plot and dialogue but transfers the play’s action to the contemporary Melbourne underworld, where Macbeth (Sam Worthington) murders crime boss Duncan (Gary Sweet), is appointed head of his organised crime gang, and as per the conventions of Shakespearean tragedy endures an inevitable downfall. 
Much of the pleasure of Wright’s adaptation comes from the ingenious ways it adapts Shakespeare’s source to modern day Melbourne’s criminal fraternity, the same turf depicted in the first of the popular Underbelly television series (unsurprisingly, 13 members of Macbeth’s cast would appear in that series or its offshoots). At the obvious surface level, drug deals and gun fights and car chases stand in for battles and swordfights, but other updates are more inventive. For example, the weird sisters are transformed into private schoolgirls, first seen defacing statues and graves in a cemetery like St Trinian’s rejects, and their first encounter with Macbeth is in an empty nightclub, accompanied by dry ice, dance music and disco lighting. There are other nice touches, like the way Wright and Hill interpret the dagger Macbeth hallucinates before slaying Duncan, or Birnam Wood’s arrival at Dunsinane. And things take an amusing turn into Scarface territory at film’s end. In the film’s DVD extras, Worthington recalls that “Geoffrey pitched it to me as the most violent Australian film ever made, and he wanted it to get banned”. Obviously Wright hasn’t seen Turkey Shoot, but he still gives it a go: Duncan’s murder is an especially stab-heavy, stab-happy experience.
But these are all broad strokes, and it is testament to the film’s overall accomplishment that its take on Macbeth works not only in these signature moments and scenes, but also in smaller moments, such as the nicely handled interaction between Lady Macduff (Kat Stewart) and her son (Louis Corbett), which feels entirely fresh and contemporary despite using Shakespeare’s language. Several asides featuring the Macbeths’ maid (Katherine Tonkin) – clearing the table following Macbeth’s dinner party hallucination, being unceremoniously shot at film’s end by Banquo’s son Fleance (Craig Stott) – also signify Wright and Hill’s savvy elaboration on their source play. Indeed, such is the magnetic, gravitational pull of Macbeth and Lady Macbeth that many productions can be a slog whenever they’re not on stage or screen, but Wright’s film consistently engages even when its leads are absent.
However, and as expected, it’s strongest when they’re onscreen. In addition to forgetting how great the film is, I’d forgotten how great Sam Worthington is as the titular tragic hero. Like Jai Courtney, star of last week's film FelonyWorthington has been maligned for bland, generic leading man roles in films like Avatar and Clash/Wrath of the Titans, but here he’s lean and hungry, unafraid to go broad where needed and comfortable delivering Shakespeare’s lines in a thick Australian brogue. It’s not deep acting, but it’s strong work. Co-writer Victoria Hill also delivers strong work as Lady Macbeth: deeply wounded and heavily anaesthetised at film’s start, newly re-energised after ambition invests her with the spark of life, and suitably raw and distraught at film’s end. Elsewhere in the cast, Lachy Hulme gives an imposing, muscular performance as Macduff, comedian Mick Molloy and brother John are fun as a pair of killers, and it’s delightful to hear Shakespeare’s early modern dialogue filtered through all those flat, nasally Australian cadences.
With the exception of Kurosawa’s Throne of Blood, which thoroughly transformed Shakespeare’s play into a new idiom both culturally and cinematically, most Macbeth films feel hamstrung as movies and unsatisfying as theatre, neither fish nor fowl (or foul and fair). Wright’s Macbeth, however, is pretty great: it looks, sounds and moves like a movie, it’s an absolute blast, and its rough edges are part of its skeezy charm…
Ben Kooyman

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Innocence (1989)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Director:  Scott Murray Stars:  Katia Caballero, Keith Smith Scott Murray is one of the premier commentators on Australian cinema. He’s best known as editor and contributor to  Cinema Papers  and  Senses of Cinema , as well as for editing, authoring, and contributing to various volumes on Australian film, including one particularly indispensable resource for my work on Down Under Flix,  Australian Film 1978–1994 . In the 1980s, Murray directed the film  Beyond Innocence , also known as  Devil in the Flesh . It was both his theatrical feature debut and swansong, though he’d later helm a music documentary,  Massenet: His Life and Music . 

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...