Skip to main content

Sister Act: Hotel Sorrento (1995)

Like the source texts for Cosi and Looking for Alibrandi, I studied Hannie Rayson’s AWGIE-winning play Hotel Sorrento in high school, as well as seeing a touring stage production and watching two thirds of Richard Franklin’s film adaptation. At the time I found the play trite, though I didn’t know that word. I was also ignorant of the greatness of Franklin and star John Hargreaves, so revisiting Franklin’s Hotel Sorrento (1995) in full almost a quarter century later, my frames of reference have expanded. While I find the play a lot less trite, I remain lukewarm on the film.  

Like the recently reviewed My Year Without Sex and Floating Life, Hotel Sorrento is family-focused, and like the latter film sister-focused. After the death of a family patriarch (Ray Barrett), daughter Meg (import Caroline Goodall, following a high-profile run including Hook, Cliffhanger, Schindler's List, and Disclosure), a novelist based in London, returns home to Australia with her British husband (Nicholas Bell) where she is reunited with sisters Hilary and Pippa (Caroline Gillmer and Tara Morice, the same year as Metal Skin) and nephew (Ben Thomas). Hovering on the sidelines as long-standing sibling tensions arise is laconic journalist Dick (Hargreaves, an old hand at headlining Australian stage-to-film adaptations after The Removalists, Don’s Party, and Emerald City) and friend Marge (import Joan Plowright) who elucidates that Meg has set her recent Booker Prize-nominated novel in Sorrento and dramatized her family in her fiction.

Objectively speaking, Hotel Sorrento is a perfectly well-executed and well-acted family drama, and the themes and preoccupations of the play-text translate to film. Where the soundstage-bound artifice of Hollywood cinema in the early to mid-twentieth century meant stage adaptations didn’t have to sweat as much about opening up and shedding their theatricality (see, for example, films derived from Pulitzer Prize winners like Harvey, A Streetcar Named Desire, and Picnic) the subsequent shift towards realism in film has engendered the impulse to make stage adaptations feel cinematic. With its short scenes across multiple locations (including Meg's London apartment) Rayson’s play lends itself particularly well to film, and Franklin and co nudge it further towards cinema by keeping characters walking and cameras in motion, especially in external shooting locations with innate production value. This includes a cinema screening Wayne’s World 2, The Beverly Hillbillies, and Tombstone (what a triple feature!) which Dick and Marge stroll past. 



However, outside the immediacy of live performance, much wit is lost and scenes feel soapier. Hotel Sorrento and Franklin’s subsequent film Brilliant Lies, another stage adaptation, were attempts (and successful ones) at reviving his Australian career and courting critical respectability following the failure of thrillers Link and sequel FX2: The Deadly Art of Illusion. With its central mystery and competing he-said she-said vantage points, Brilliant Lies utilized some of Franklin’s skill set as an engineer of Hitchcockian thrillers. In contrast, Hotel Sorrento is a traditional drama, and in this respect a radical departure, but said radicalism yielded rather ordinary, pedestrian cinema. Franklin was rewarded by the establishment with 10 AFI Award nominations and two wins (for Screenplay and Barrett) for Hotel Sorrento [1], an indictment of a short-sighted industry—two in fact, Hollywood included—that didn’t know what they had in the gifted director of Patrick, Roadgames, Psycho II, and Cloak & Dagger.

Ben

  

[1] The big winner was Angel Baby, whose director Michael Rymer would later pull a reverse Franklin and pivot into genre waters with Queen of the Damned.

 

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Innocence (1989)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Director:  Scott Murray Stars:  Katia Caballero, Keith Smith Scott Murray is one of the premier commentators on Australian cinema. He’s best known as editor and contributor to  Cinema Papers  and  Senses of Cinema , as well as for editing, authoring, and contributing to various volumes on Australian film, including one particularly indispensable resource for my work on Down Under Flix,  Australian Film 1978–1994 . In the 1980s, Murray directed the film  Beyond Innocence , also known as  Devil in the Flesh . It was both his theatrical feature debut and swansong, though he’d later helm a music documentary,  Massenet: His Life and Music . 

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...