Skip to main content

Dark City (1998)

 



Dark City opens with John (friend of Australian cinema Rufus Sewell, In a Savage Land) waking in a bathtub in a dimly lit hotel room in a dimly lit city, with blood on his forehead, a dead woman in the next room, and no memory of who he is or how he got there. He goes on the lam and starts to piece together who he is, guided by the bread-crumbs left by Dr Schreber, a mad scientist type (friend of Australian cinema Kiefer Sutherland, Paradise Found and lovingly photographed by Dean Semler in Young Guns I and II, The Three Musketeers, and The Cowboy Way). In pursuit of John is a weary (or maybe just sleepy) detective Bumstead (William Hurt) and, separately, a group of pale-faced, black-clad “Strangers” who John witnesses shutting the city down at midnight and “tuning” (that is, altering) the environment and its occupants’ identities.    

It’s a terrific setup for one of the very best science-fiction films of the 1990s. Dark City is a film of impeccable visuals (shot by Dariusz Wolski) and craft, with no wasted or throwaway shots. It’s gorgeous, in its baroque way, from its big set pieces to fleeting, second-unit insert shots, such as a cockroach scurrying across a floor. Dark City also moves fast, shorn of superfluous niceties and wrapping in an efficient 100 mins. That’s a few minutes longer than Almost an Angel, and 10 minutes shorter than Burning Man, films that don’t have to tease, reveal, explain, and satisfactorily pay off high-concept sci-fi premises. The film unfolds in ruthlessly short, punchy scenes (edited by frequent Michael Mann and Andrew Davis collaborator Dov Hoenig). Some brisk action and character beats might benefit from a little more room to breathe, but it’s also telling and smart that the scenes which hold the longest, near film’s end, are (i) Schreber finally laying out the backstory to John and Bumstead and (ii) the action finale, both satisfactory payoffs to the propulsive preceding story. 

Like Blade Runner and Burton’s Batman—obvious points of reference, though Dark City perhaps leans more towards the latter with its mannerist compositions & score and archer sensibility—Proyas's film is in step with the noir films of the 1940s, and in turn the expressionist cinema of the 1920s. Those influences are evident in the film’s moody lightning, ornate architecture and decor, Sewell’s darting-eyes, near-careening-off-the-rails characterization of the wrongfully-accused hero, Sutherland’s Peter Lorre-esque turn, and Hurt reaching dry acting apotheosis. Jennifer Connelly is a little wasted and has less flavour to play with as John’s wife, but does nice earnest work regardless. Despite constant effects trickery, the settings of Dark City feel physical, tangible, tactile, and in this respect refreshingly at odds with modern blockbusters, and indeed Proyas’s subsequent work, which leans more overtly into CGI. 

Proyas is a visual stylist and action director cut from the same cloth as Russell Mulcahy, and has endured some of the same critical slings and arrows, though he hasn’t yet directed DTV or been insulted by Sylvester Stallone. My read on the filmmaker has changed over time. My early, ignorant read was that Proyas was a dark fantasy wunderkind artiste (The Crow, Dark City) who then made a flimsy bubblegum flick (Garage Days) and then sold out and made dumb Hollywood films (I, Robot, Knowing, Gods of Egypt). Little wonder, with such gross simplifications, that Proyas is wary of critics. My viewing of Garage Days in 2017, which I greatly enjoyed, shifted that negative perception, and I saw that film’s amiable goofiness at work in his later Hollywood flicks (Gods of Egypt, after all, features Bryan Brown as an Egyptian god, which could only be, ahem, knowingly tongue in cheek). I’d now argue that goofy sensibility has always pervaded Proyas’s work, substantiated after finally seeing his first film, Spirits of the Air: Gremlins of the Cloudswhich for all its artsy pretensions is pretty goofyand revisiting The Crow; while the pall of tragedy still hangs strong over the film, the goofiness of its Goth operatics is now more apparent, and Brandon Lee’s striking performance brushes up against Jim-Carrey-in-The-Mask zany energy at times. Some of that goofiness also pervades Dark City, in its loopy premise, black comic moments, and Richard O’Brien intertextually bringing some Rocky Horror Picture Show camp to proceedings. 

In contrast to Garage Days, the Australianness on this one is, like Elvis, fairly faint, but is there on the fringes in its Antipodean director, some casting choices (Melissa George, Bruce Spence, Colin Friels, and according to IMDb David Wenham, though I did not spot him), its status as a US-Australia co-production, and like The Matrixreleased one year laterfilming in real locations around Sydney and on the soundstages at Moore Park. Quite coincidentally (spoilers hereafter), it’s the second film featured this month, following The Last Wave, in which rebirthpromised or actualcomes in the form of water eliminating alienmetaphorical or literalinvaders. It’s also the second time in 1998, following Stephen Hopkins’ Lost in Space, that an Australian director left William Hurt lost in space. 

This could technically be another Back to School entry, since I studied Dark City at high school in 1999. But unlike Cosi and Looking for Alibrandi, it’s a film I’d seen before and have watched several times since. Watching it again, I was unnerved by the film’s concluding moments in which John, victorious, "tunes" the world to his liking. This sequence, which previously struck me as unequivocally triumphant, carried a sinister, ambiguous undercurrent on this viewing: while the city is liberated from the Strangers, it's now John’s playground to be shaped in his image, potentially beginning a new cycle of control. It speaks to the richness of Proyas’s film that it continues to elicit new impressions and invite reinterpretation umpteen viewings later. 

Ben



Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Innocence (1989)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Director:  Scott Murray Stars:  Katia Caballero, Keith Smith Scott Murray is one of the premier commentators on Australian cinema. He’s best known as editor and contributor to  Cinema Papers  and  Senses of Cinema , as well as for editing, authoring, and contributing to various volumes on Australian film, including one particularly indispensable resource for my work on Down Under Flix,  Australian Film 1978–1994 . In the 1980s, Murray directed the film  Beyond Innocence , also known as  Devil in the Flesh . It was both his theatrical feature debut and swansong, though he’d later helm a music documentary,  Massenet: His Life and Music . 

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...