Skip to main content

Paradise Found (2003)



Published 2016 on Down Under Flix

Director: Mario Andreacchio
Stars: Kiefer Sutherland, Natassja Kinski, Alun Armstrong, Chris Haywood, Nicholas Hope
A broad ocker comedy. A gritty police procedural charting murky moral waters. A Shakespeare adaptation. A road movie about Indigenous youth. An art-house drama about intimacy issues. Given the variety of films covered on Down Under Flix thus far, it’s fairly clear that “Australian cinema” is a fluid, rubbery, malleable term that can encompass a range of different genres, styles and tones.
Paradise Found, a film about a French artist in Tahiti starring the guy from The Lost Boys and 24, is another Australian film, and a somewhat unlikely one. But this Paul Gauguin biopic has an Australian director, Mario Andreacchio; it features veteran Australian actors in supporting roles; it was filmed in Queensland as well as the Czech Republic; and it was funded by Australian as well as French, German and British financiers. And while we tend to associate such cinematic appropriations of other cultures and historical figures with Hollywood – by way of example, Anthony Quinn scored an Oscar for playing Gauguin in Vincente Minnelli’s 1956 Vincent van Gogh biopic Lust for Life – it’s also a typical instance of cinematic globalization in action. 
The plot of Paradise Found alternates between two periods and places: 1870s Europe and 1890s Tahiti. In the former, a chance meeting with the artist Camille Pissaro (Alun Armstrong) ignites a creative spark in husband, father and stockbroker Paul Gauguin (Kiefer Sutherland) that leads to the dissolution of his marriage and career in pursuit of art. In the latter, an older, dissolute Gauguin arrives in Tahiti and struggles with artist’s block before finding inspiration in the dying culture and natural beauty of the island, and in the process challenges the local missionary and authorities. 
Director Mario Andreacchio is an interesting cat. His feature debut, Fair Game, was an outback-set, rough and tumble Ozploitation thriller about a woman being victimized by three kangaroo hunters and exacting bloody revenge on her tormentors (click here for an old piece I wrote on Fair Game and other Ozploitation thrillers). He later specialized in family-themed, usually animal-centric entertainments, like Napoleon (about a golden retriever), The Real Macaw (about a parrot), Elephant Tales (no explanation needed) and most recently The Dragon Pearl (about a dragon). Amidst all this, he made a film about Gauguin. Andreacchio’s a talented and – given his choice of genres and subject matter –internationally-minded director, and on a craft level Paradise Found is topnotch. The photography and art direction throughout are clean and colourful, much like Gauguin’s work, rejecting the default muted aesthetic of many period productions. In addition, the dual timelines structure keeps the film interesting and zipping along, rather than the typical chronological A to Z biopic structure.
However, the film’s chief issue is that despite its structural ingenuity, it otherwise conforms closely to the very well-worn tropes and clichés of biopics about artists, writers, musicians, athletes, and so on. It’s understandable why these tropes and clichés exist: they help the medicine go down, providing recognizable shorthand to help filmmakers encapsulate and wrestle life stories onto film. Andreacchio’s task isn’t enviable: on top of depicting one of the great nineteenth century artists, he must also paint in broad strokes the Parisian art scene of the late 1800s, the intoxicating natural beauty of Tahiti, and the devastating effects of colonialism on the island. Consequently, one shouldn’t be surprised that Paradise Found is cut from the same cloth as other films about tortured, misunderstood geniuses who create great works and act like total jerks.
But unlike, say, Mike Leigh’s Mr. Turner or Ed Harris’s PollockParadise Found never really transcends those tropes, and the result is a somewhat formulaic, Hero’s Journey-shaped biopic with familiar plot beats. For example, at one point Gauguin proclaims to his long-suffering wife Mette (Natassja Kinski) “I am going to do something different, something that nobody has ever seen before! I am here to start a revolution!” It’s an instance of the tropes doing all the work: Gauguin says he’s a great artist, we as viewers know he’s a great artist, we’ve seen similar moments in similar films, and there’s a base appeal to seeing someone stick it to the system, hence the scene coasts on that mutual understanding without offering fresh insights. Still, it gets the job done.
With Paradise Found, Kiefer Sutherland became the second member of the Sutherland family to essay the role of Paul Gauguin: his father played the painter in 1986’s Oviri. The film was made during Sutherland’s tenure on 24, the TV series that provided a nice autumn for the star’s waning career, and it’s curious to see how the actor, so formidable and swaggering and outsized on the small screen, feels just a bit too small for Gauguin on the big screen. He delivers a good performance and tears into the part with relish, roaring and snarling and brooding up a storm and laughing like a pirate (really, we should’ve seen that coming), but he never quite transcends the “rebel artist” archetype he’s working with. Similarly, Natassja Kinski does good work but never transcends her generic “downtrodden wife”role.
The supporting cast, free of character arcs, have more fun. Chris Haywood (star of last week's Human Touch) is suitably grizzled and dissolute as Gauguin’s Tahitian confidante, while fellow local actor Nicholas Hope is simultaneously bristly and sympathetic as a priest misguided in his conviction to destroy the Tahitian culture. Also a nice presence is Alun Armstrong, an instantly recognizable “that guy” character actor with credits ranging from Braveheart and Patriot Games to Married… with Children, in the role of Pissaro.
Paradise Found is an entertaining primer for Gauguin newbies and a good example of Australian cinematic globalization, but it feels very, very familiar.
Ben Kooyman

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Innocence (1989)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Director:  Scott Murray Stars:  Katia Caballero, Keith Smith Scott Murray is one of the premier commentators on Australian cinema. He’s best known as editor and contributor to  Cinema Papers  and  Senses of Cinema , as well as for editing, authoring, and contributing to various volumes on Australian film, including one particularly indispensable resource for my work on Down Under Flix,  Australian Film 1978–1994 . In the 1980s, Murray directed the film  Beyond Innocence , also known as  Devil in the Flesh . It was both his theatrical feature debut and swansong, though he’d later helm a music documentary,  Massenet: His Life and Music . 

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...