Skip to main content

AUSgust: Dingo (1991)



Published 2018 on Down Under Flix

Director: Rolf De Heer
Stars: Colin Friels, Miles Davis, Helen Buday, Joe Petruzzi
This month is AUSgust, a month devoted to Australian film appreciation masterminded by The Curb’s Andrew Peirce. You can read about AUGgust here and follow along on social media using the hashtag #AUSgust. The work of Rolf De Heer is the theme for Day 2, so here’s a review of De Heer’s 1991 film Dingo. You can also read my take on De Heer's The Old Man Who Read Love Stories here.
In a 2003 book advocating against dodgy grammar, Lynne Truss shows how an innocuous description of a panda (“Panda: eats shoots and leaves”) can be warped into something more sinister with the introduction of an extra comma: “Panda: eats, shoots and leaves”. Grammar quandaries aside, that phrase “eats, shoots and leaves” always struck me as an apt description of Australian filmmakers who shoot some features locally before leaving for international pastures and bigger opportunities, a trend that started with the Australian New Wave crop (Beresford, Armstrong, Weir, Miller, Schepisi, Noyce) and continues to this day, with exports of the past decade including John Hillcoat, David Michod, Justin Kurzel, Patrick Hughes, and newly minted blockbuster helmer Cate Shortland. Of directors who have stayed put and enjoyed long and prolific careers locally, Paul Cox and Rolf De Heer are exemplars, though the latter has flirted with international co-productions on two occasions, the first being 1991’s Dingo
While the title Dingo suggests a Lassie/Rin Tin Tin-style film about a intrepid canine adventurer (and had Mario Andreacchio directed, it probably would be), De Heer’s film instead focuses on John ‘Dingo’ Anderson (Colin Friels), a husband, father, dingo trapper and jazz enthusiast. After a childhood encounter with jazz legend Billy Cross (Miles Davis), John becomes a lifelong jazz aficionado and trumpeter, creating his own music and secretly saving for a pilgrimage to Paris to reunite with his idol. Following a series of events which estrange John from his wife Jane (Helen Buday) and make him an object of ridicule in his Western Australian outback town, John takes the plunge and travels to France to seek out Cross.
C.S. Lewis once wrote that “No man who bothers about originality will ever be original; whereas if you simply try to tell the truth (without caring twopence how often it has been told before) you will, nine times out of ten, become original without ever having noticed it”. De Heer is a filmmaker who consistently manages to have his cake and eat it too: his films are frequently novel in their technique & form and/or subject matter, but are also honest and authentic in their treatment of flawed outsiders and human foibles. These virtues are apparent in Dingo: where in other hands this tale would be fairly rote, De Heer and screenwriter Marc Rosenberg bring empathy and a magical realist quality to the narrative. The film is grounded in the recognisable and the everyday, but with a smidgen of the fantastical: Cross literally descends into the young John’s life from the sky when his plane lands unexpectedly outside town, and bequeaths John the gift of jazz before ascending back; jazz provides escapism from the mundane for the adult John; and there’s a Wizard of Oz subtext where John leaves his everyday environs (ironically, Oz), journeying to France to see his nominal wizard (Cross) before returning home content and affirmed. Phil Alden Robinson’s Field of Dreams, released two years earlier, springs to mind as a film of similar stock, though Robinson’s film is much more overt in its magical elements.
On its surface Dingo is probably De Heer’s most mainstream film (though by no means his most entertaining or crowd-pleasing), which is a funny thing to say about a magical realist film about an outback jazz player starring Colin Friels. Friels will be a familiar face to Down Under Flix readers (see HoodwinkThe Coolangatta GoldHigh TideMr Reliable) and is always a welcome one. His likeable everyman demeanour is a sound match for John, and it’s a shame he and De Heer haven’t worked together again. Buday, who would reunite with De Heer on the terrific thriller Alexandra’s Project, does similarly likeable work as Jane. The role of Cross was originally earmarked for another music legend, Sammy Davis Jnr, but illness prevented him from starring (Davis Jnr would pass away in 1990; eventual star Miles Davis died in 1991, the year of Dingo’s release). It’s difficult to imagine the Rat Packer and perennial Mr Showbiz disappearing into the role of Cross; Davis Jr was great, but he was a familiar onscreen presence, not to mention a regular with Australian TV audiences through appearances on The Don Lane Show. Miles Davis is an ideal fit; he wasn’t really an actor per se, and some of these limitations show, but his personality never overrides the characterisation. He’s recognisable enough a face to evoke a sense of history and familiarity, but unknown enough (at least outside jazz fandom) to generate some mystery and mystique. Onscreen, Davis has a nice line in quiet gravitas, and with his pronounced dark glasses, helmet of hair, and gravelly voice the late musician makes a strong impression. Admittedly there’s a touch of the “magical negro” archetype that would become prevalent in American film over the subsequent two decades, but Dingo evades the more insipid characteristics of that stock character. Davis also contributed heavily to the soundtrack alongside Michael Legrand, renowned for his scores for The Umbrellas of Cherbourg and The Young Girls of Rochefort, among others.* I’m not equipped to critique jazz – I confess I subscribe to the Talladega Nights school of jazz appreciation – but I dug the score.
With production spanning two continents and use of an overseas star, Dingo carried a heavier price tag than the director’s usual fare ($5.6 million, albeit still peanuts compared to most) and was the first of only two De Heer films to be internationally co-produced, the other being the excellent The Old Man Who Read Love Stories. The headache of working on a larger canvas with more stakeholders, combined with the ultimately (and undeservedly) middling reception on Dingo’s release, were – as noted by Jane Freebury in her insightful book-length study of De Heer, Dancing to His Song – definitive in shaping De Heer’s subsequent career trajectory. His next film would be the independent and idiosyncratic Bad Boy Bubby, which scored him an AFI award for Best Director and set the tone for the rest of his independent, idiosyncratic filmography.
*As a James Bond fan, I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention Legrand’s delightful score for Never Say Never Again, and as a Never Say Never Again fan, I’d be remiss if I didn’t mention Klaus Maria Brandauer’s delightful, top 5 Bond villain turn in said film.
Ben Kooyman

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Innocence (1989)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Director:  Scott Murray Stars:  Katia Caballero, Keith Smith Scott Murray is one of the premier commentators on Australian cinema. He’s best known as editor and contributor to  Cinema Papers  and  Senses of Cinema , as well as for editing, authoring, and contributing to various volumes on Australian film, including one particularly indispensable resource for my work on Down Under Flix,  Australian Film 1978–1994 . In the 1980s, Murray directed the film  Beyond Innocence , also known as  Devil in the Flesh . It was both his theatrical feature debut and swansong, though he’d later helm a music documentary,  Massenet: His Life and Music . 

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...