Skip to main content

Liquid Bridge (2003)



Published 2016 on Down Under Flix

Director: Phillip Avalon
Stars: Ryan Kwanten, Simone Kessell, Jeremy Sims
Most of what I know about surfing I learned from watching Point Break. And given that surfing is maybe only the eleventh most interesting thing about that delightful film, it’s safe to assume I know very little about surfing. But director Phillip Avalon is well versed in the art and sport of surfing. Liquid Bridge is the former professional surfer turned filmmaker’s feature directing debut, though he’d accumulated a solid number of credits as producer, writer and actor over the years. Fittingly, Avalon’s first major project working in all three of those capacities was another surf-centric flick, 1977’s Summer City, co-starring Mel Gibson and John Jarratt. 
In Liquid Bridge, protagonist Nick (Ryan Kwanten) works at his father’s garage and dreams of being a professional surfer like his dad (Tony Bonner), whose pro career was cut tragically short by an accident. He joins his recently widowed friend Dane (Jarrod Dean) on the pro circuit, but when Dane dies of an overdose and drugs are found among their possessions, Nick is wrongly accused of smuggling and put on trial.
In publicity for the film, Avalon emphasized the project’s roots in his own surfing experiences. In an extra on the film’s local DVD release, he explains that he wanted Liquid Bridge “to keep true to surf culture”. Elsewhere, in an interview with If Magazine, he elaborates that “it was something very close to my heart. I was a professional surfer. Surfing is part of my life. I understood the genre and the culture.” That authenticity shines through in the film’s surfing sequences. There’s some genuine electricity in these scenes: Avalon knows how to shoot waves as they roar, plummet, sweep, curl, rush and do their elemental thing. Nature is a spectacular special effect that rivals a million dollars of CGI, and Avalon knows how to capture it. Consequently, within the context of the story, it’s easy to see why Nick is seduced by and yearns for the surf. 
Having said that, there’s a soap operatic quality to certain stretches of the film. In particular, some of the dramatic scenes play out like soap opera in terms of staging and composition, performance, and dialogue (the presence of Kwanten, then relatively fresh off his tenure on Home and Away, accentuates this). The film’s budgetary constraints also rear their head in these scenes, where the film switches from stunning vistas to more D.I.Y.-looking sets. However, the film has a few brushes with the ridiculous that work in its favour. For example, there’s a framing device showcasing the invention of surfing, a training montage culminating in a makeshift surfing simulation in prison, and the disposal of the antagonists at film’s end is endearingly broad. These moments add flavour and character to what could otherwise be a fairly rote Karate-Kid-meets-courtroom-drama-on-a-surfboard (which, now that I’ve put it into words, doesn’t sound remotely rote at all…).
Now’s as good a time as any to make a public confession: for six years I was a Home and Away addict and took great comfort in its sun-kissed emotional manipulation five nights a week. A number of the actors from the period I watched went on to international success, including Chris Hemsworth, Jason Clark, and Kwanten. I never pegged Hemsworth or Clark for the big time – thus I’d make a poor talent scout – but I figured Kwanten would go onto bigger things, as he later did in the HBO series True Blood (whilst continuing to star in smaller, interesting stuff locally like Red Hill and Mystery Road). He’s operating at a lower star wattage here, but is still good as the wrongfully accused, morally conflicted surf disciple. Meanwhile, Simone Kessell plays his French photographer girlfriend, and while the character is seemingly scientifically engineered to appeal to heterosexual males, she invests the role with purpose and weight.
Liquid Bridge is soapy and clichéd at times, but its surf scenes are impressive and it brushes against the ridiculous in exactly the right way.
Ben Kooyman

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Innocence (1989)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Director:  Scott Murray Stars:  Katia Caballero, Keith Smith Scott Murray is one of the premier commentators on Australian cinema. He’s best known as editor and contributor to  Cinema Papers  and  Senses of Cinema , as well as for editing, authoring, and contributing to various volumes on Australian film, including one particularly indispensable resource for my work on Down Under Flix,  Australian Film 1978–1994 . In the 1980s, Murray directed the film  Beyond Innocence , also known as  Devil in the Flesh . It was both his theatrical feature debut and swansong, though he’d later helm a music documentary,  Massenet: His Life and Music . 

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...