Skip to main content

Aussiewood: The Portrait of a Lady (1996)



Published 2017 on Down Under Flix

Director: Jane Campion
Stars: Nicole Kidman, John Malkovich, Barbara Hershey, Martin Donovan, Viggo Mortensen, Shelley Winters, Shelley Duvall, Richard E. Grant
The Portrait of a Lady opens with voiceover of modern liberated women (with predominantly Antipodean accents) talking about kissing. A montage follows during the film’s opening credits, showing contemporary women of different cultural backgrounds lying in a circle, dancing, staring into camera, and so on. The film then cuts to Nicole Kidman—as the film’s heroine Isabel Archer—in 1870s England, dressed in period garb, frizzy hair severely curtailed, and hiding away following an unwanted marriage proposal. The film’s opening minutes nicely encapsulate Campion’s interest—an interest that pervades her filmography— in women both past and present, their spirits and agency, and attempts to domesticate and discipline them by various, frequently patriarchal entities. 
Following our previous looks at Australian directors working overseas (see here and here), The Portrait of a Lady finds Campion—like Sam Neill and Russell Crowe a product of both New Zealand and Australia—adapting Henry James’ door-stopping 1881 serial turned novel to the screen. Kidman’s Isabel Archer is a young woman of independent mind bequeathed a considerable inheritance following the passing of her uncle (John Gielgud). Rejecting various romantic suitors, she seeks to travel Europe. However, her supposed friend, the scheming Madame Merle (Barbara Hershey), orchestrates a union between Isabel and the cruel Gilbert Osmond (John Malkovich), and Isabel becomes trapped in an unhappy marriage, tormented by her psychologically abusive husband.
Campion studied at the Australian Film, Television and Radio School in the early 1980s, following in the footsteps of former graduate Gillian Armstrong, whose film Mr Brilliant Career was impressionable on the younger director. She recalls how “Seeing Gill Armstrong make My Brilliant Career, it was just like ‘God they’re going to let girls do it too’ … it just opened up that door in my mind that maybe it would be possible for me too” (Jane Campion: Cinema, Nation, Identity, p. 282). That first shot of Kidman in The Portrait of a Lady—period garb, curtailed frizzy hair— intertextually evokes My Brilliant Career’s heroine Sybylla Melvyn (Judy Davis in her star-making role), but where Sybylla’s rejection of suitor Harry Beecham (Sam Neill) serves as that film’s denouement, here Isabel’s rejection of Lord Warburton’s (Richard E. Grant) proposal is the story’s starting point. Their reasons for rejecting these proposals are the same, yet where My Brilliant Career ends on a note of promise and self-possession, Campion’s film chronicles the erosion of its protagonist’s agency and self-possession over the course of the story.
Gender politics, the politics of relationships, and how women negotiate their identities within relationships are recurring motifs in Campion’s work (Bright Star, her film about the romance between poet John Keats and Fanny Brawne, is anomalous in its positive presentation of a healthy, but still ultimately tragic, onscreen romance). The Portrait of a Lady is potentially Campion’s bleakest meditation on these themes. Its critical reception was chilly in the aftermath of The Piano, and it’s easy to see why: it lacks the former film’s novel setting and hooks; it’s heavily dialogue-driven (which The Piano wasn’t by virtue of its central conceit), though not without moments of expressionism; and it’s an unsentimental, resolutely no-swoon zone, turning a cold shoulder to The Piano’s complicated romanticism and eroticism. Yet even at its most baroque and remote, there’s much to admire about The Portrait of a Lady’s infusion of Gothic romance with feminist lament, and there’s a tactility to the film not typically seen in heritage cinema, nor in those other noteworthy adaptations of Henry James by producer-director team Ishmael Merchant and James Ivory (i.e. The BostoniansThe Wings of the DoveThe Golden Bowl).
The film’s cast list reads like the Tombstone of heritage cinema, peppered with veteran performers (Gielgud, Shelley Duvall, Shelley Winters) and newer talents and stars on the ascent (Grant, Mary Louise Parker, Christian Bale, Viggo Mortensen). Malkovich brings some of his Dangerous Liaisons baggage to the part, and while his character is somewhat more one-dimensional here he excels in exuding Osmond’s nonchalant cruelty. Hershey, who’d do further noteworthy work with Australian directors in subsequent years (see Passion, LantanaInsidious), similarly excels as the inscrutable and damned Madame Merle and was Oscar-nominated for her efforts. Also doing great work is the great Martin Donovan—best known for his caustic everyman roles in Hal Hartley films like Trust and Amateur—as Isabel’s ailing cousin, sympathetic ear, and unrequited romantic prospect. Front and centre (see the poster above) is Kidman, perennially underrated and skilfully essaying the curdling of Isabel’s ambitions and spirit. Alas, the film was released between Batman Forever and The Peacemaker, which is like being released between a hate crime and cardboard, and it would be a few years before Kidman started earning the props she deserved.
The Portrait of a Lady likewise deserves some props. The film and its director’s post-Piano bad rap continued with her next project, Holy Smoke, leading to numerous articles (frequently by male critics) lamenting or lampooning her fall, such as ‘Losing the Way: The Decline of Jane Campion’ by Adrian Martin and ‘Holey Smoking Reputation’ by Phillip Adams. But Campion has proven her longevity and vitality, and her cold and coolly received The Portrait of a Lady warrants a similar reassessment.
Ben Kooyman

Popular posts from this blog

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...

John Hargreaves double feature: Hoodwink (1981) and Sky Pirates (1986)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Discounting the film  Blackfellas , in which he plays a minor role as a racist policeman, I’m surprised it’s taken this long to cover any John Hargreaves films on Down Under Flix. A six time AFI Award nominee (including for  Hoodwink ) and triple winner, Hargreaves is one of the best leading men to emerge from the Australian New Wave, and I have particular regard for his work in  Don’s Party,   Long Weekend , and  The Odd Angry Shot . Hargreaves was a natural performer: gifted and charismatic, but not unnecessarily flashy; handsome, but not movie star handsome, and slightly crumpled like a creased jacket. He was a quintessential Australian everyman ala Jack Thompson and Bryan Brown, though he’s less familiar to young filmgoers today, partly due to his untimely passing in 1996 at age 50. This article looks at one of Hargreaves’ best films… and one of his other films…