Skip to main content

One Night the Moon (2001)



Published 2016 on Down Under Flix

Director: Rachel Perkins
Stars: Paul Kelly, Kaarin Fairfax, Kelton Pall
In the opening scene of One Night the Moon, farmer Jim Ryan (Paul Kelly) awakens at his kitchen table. An empty bottle stands at his side, a remnant from a night of drinking to numb his pain. But the pain waits in readiness for him that morning, made clear when he launches into song about having naught to live for. He retrieves his rifle, passes an empty child’s bedroom, then his own bedroom where his wife Rose (Kaarin Fairfax, also Kelly’s offscreen wife) lies crumpled and defeated, then wanders out into the harsh outback. In these few minutes One Night the Moon makes two things abundantly clear. Firstly, it’s a musical, and secondly, it’s not one of the toe-tapping, knee-slapping variety. Where some of the best movie musicals have an inherent weightlessness to them, One Night the Moon is all weight: oppressive, foreboding weight. 
Set in 1932 and inspired by true events, One Night the Moon depicts the disappearance and search for a young girl (played by the offscreen daughter of Kelly and Fairfax, Memphis Kelly) and the resulting emotional fallout. The local constabulary (headed by Chris Haywood and David Field) are deployed to investigate, but Jim refuses to let Aboriginal tracker Albert Yang (Kelton Pall) assist with the hunt for his daughter on his land. Despite the white search party’s lack of success and Albert’s continued overtures that they’re looking in the wrong places, Jim stubbornly refuses to relent. 
Director Rachel Perkins’ debut feature Radiance was the first film by a female director spotlighted on Down Under Flix (see my review here). That piece included some troubling statistics about the number of women filmmakers in the Australian film industry, and more recent reports indicate that things aren’t really getting better. Perkins is a necessary and vital presence in local cinema: look no further than her bold choice of a 57-minute musical retelling of a tragic historical incident for her sophomore feature (or, for that matter, her savvy choice to return to the musical genre a few years later with the feature-length, commercially slicker Bran Nue Dae).
One Night the Moon balances realism and theatricality. On the one hand, it’s grounded by its setting and protagonists – weathered, dog-eared individuals occupying severe country terrain – but on the other hand, it’s liberated from realism by the innate excesses of its genre. Bolstered by music and song and not tethered to naturalism, Perkins and co play with some big symbols and amplify even minor dramatic moments, telling their story in broad, evocative brush strokes. The phrase “epic but intimate” is a cliché, but it very much applies here: One Night the Moon is essentially a three-hander human drama comprising Jim, Rose and Albert that also unfolds against a vast landscape. The film was shot in South Australia’s Flinders Ranges (also seen onscreen in recent years in Rabbit Proof FenceThe TrackerThe Rover, and Wolf Creek 2), and its makers milk the contrast between the wide, unforgiving environment and the tininess of its occupants, alternating between tight close-ups of the actors’ pained, knotted faces and wider shots pulling back to isolate them in their surrounds. The presence of music and song also helps achieve this “epic but intimate” effect, the score adding grandeur to even the minutest of human gestures and expressions, investing them with a sense of the operatic.
The film’s music is composed by Mairead Hannan (who initiated the project), Kev Carmody, and Kelly. Kelly’s screen presence is slightly limited (not uncommon with musicians on film) but this fits the characterisation of the proud, pig-headed Jim, and the actor-musician finds expressiveness in his natural forte via Jim’s singing. Fairfax, an actress with a long body of work (including television adaptations of Ruth Park’s Poor Man’s Orange and Harp in the South as well as Young Einstein), fares better as the family matriarch, prohibited by gender laws and propriety of the era from taking any meaningful, decisive action. Pall also does great work as tracker Albert, similarly frustrated by the constraints of the time and torn between resignation to his lot, anger at his dispossessors, and sympathy for the missing child.
One Night the Moon belongs to a long cinematic tradition of the Australian outback preying upon visitors. Indeed, when the young child is drawn out of her home at night, seemingly hypnotised by the moon, it is evocative of the genre’s most iconic work, Picnic at Hanging Rock, in which Miranda and her friends are called by some unknowable force to some unknowable fate. Civilised trespassers get ensnared and damaged by their uncivilised surrounds frequently in Australian cinema, whether at the hands of the environment itself (Picnic at Hanging Rock, both original and remake of Long Weekend), the animals that occupy it (Razorback), or the human animals who’ve taken residence (Wake in FrightWolf Creek, Welcome to Woop Woop). In all these flicks, the land fights back against those who don’t belong, or those who try to tame and claim it.
This motif also enables Perkins’ film to address the issue of Aboriginal dispossession, with Jim reprimanded not only for his misguided pride but his original colonisation of the land and, symbolically speaking, the transgressions that preceded him. The film was released in 2001, when the issue of reconciliation and public apology for white Australia’s misdemeanours against Indigenous Australians was a source of debate under the Howard Government. Whilst a public apology would eventuate under the succeeding Rudd Government, a quote at the end of One Night the Moon – attributed to Perkins’ father, the Indigenous rights activist Charlie Perkins – serves as potent reminder that tensions of the past reverberate in the present and that reconciliation is ongoing: “We know we cannot live in the past, but the past lives within us”.
One Night the Moon is an impressive, sombre entry into Australia’s small and eclectic canon of musicals.
Ben Kooyman

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Innocence (1989)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Director:  Scott Murray Stars:  Katia Caballero, Keith Smith Scott Murray is one of the premier commentators on Australian cinema. He’s best known as editor and contributor to  Cinema Papers  and  Senses of Cinema , as well as for editing, authoring, and contributing to various volumes on Australian film, including one particularly indispensable resource for my work on Down Under Flix,  Australian Film 1978–1994 . In the 1980s, Murray directed the film  Beyond Innocence , also known as  Devil in the Flesh . It was both his theatrical feature debut and swansong, though he’d later helm a music documentary,  Massenet: His Life and Music . 

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...