Skip to main content

Yolngu Boy (2001)



Published 2016 on Down Under Flix

Director: Stephen Johnson
Stars: John Sebastian Pilakui, Nathan Daniels, Sean Mununggurr, Jack Thompson
There’s no better deal on Earth than the movies. For the cost of a cinema ticket, a monthly streaming subscription, a DVD or Blu rental, or whatever amount of data it takes to torrent a film, you can be entertained, educated, and elevated by everything from Doctor Strange to Pink Flamingos to Tokyo Story. With that embarrassment of riches, it’s little wonder Australian flicks fall through the cracks, and I’m as guilty of this as anyone. When Yolngu Boy was released in March 2001, it generated some really positive notices … which I roundly ignored along with the film, instead showering my not-so-hard-earned cash on significantly less well-received stuff like Dracula 2000 and Proof of Life. I might even have seen Miss Congeniality… on a discount day of course… But anyway, poor life decisions all around… 
Stephen Johnson’s film follows three Yolngu teenagers living in Arnhem Land in the Northern Territory. Lorrpu (John Sebastian Pilakui) is narrator and ostensible protagonist, his friend Milika (Nathan Daniels) has the makings of a great footballer, and his other friend Botj (Sean Mununggurr) has just returned to their community following a stint in juvenile prison. Lorrpu and Milika are on the verge of initiation into manhood, but the frustrated Botj has been ostracised from his family and pushed to the margins of the community. After sniffing petrol and setting fire to a building, it looks like Botj will be sent back to jail. The three friends decide to travel to Darwin together, but complications pepper their journey… 
Yolngu Boy is an adolescent adventure/road film with an Aboriginal cast. That’s a genre you don’t see very often, and one I’d welcome more of. Adventure/road movies about suburban white kids and teens are commonplace, ranging from the resonant emotional punches of Stand by Me to the screeching obnoxiousness of the inexplicably beloved The Goonies. The Indigeneity of Lorrpu, Milika, and Botj adds interesting environmental and cultural wrinkles to this well-worn formula. On the one hand, the film is very contemporary: like Ivan Sen’s Beneath Clouds, released the following year, it paints a topical (both then and now) and empathetic portrait of the troubles facing modern Indigenous youth, albeit with an extra layer of hormonal machismo as befitting a story about three 15 year-olds boys. On the other hand, there’s an ancient quality to the story as well. The protagonists encounter Dreamtime figures along their journey; they must apply the mythical and practical knowledge they learned during childhood to eat, survive, and navigate the wilderness; and their fractured friendship is rekindled as they shed the accoutrements of modernity and Western life. Somewhat atypical for a film about Indigenous Australians (or at least the ones I’ve seen, and barring pre-colonisation narratives like Rolf de Heer’s Ten Canoes), white Australia’s presence is minimal, though it’s glimpsed here and there – in artefacts of Anglo and mainstream culture, in religious symbols, and most notably in the authorities inhabiting the periphery of the story, embodied by Jack Thompson in a fleeting appearance – and its influence and impact loom large.
The film was scripted by Chris Anastassiades, co-writer of Nick Giannopoulos’ Wog Boy films and The Wannabes as well as Hating Alison Ashley, and a writer for television shows like Giannopoulos’ Acropolis NowRound the Twist, and a lot of children’s programming. That’s a filmography I wouldn’t have intuitively associated with Yolngu Boy, but in retrospect there’s a narrative propulsion to the film that reflects a grounding in the fast-paced, mechanized storytelling of comedy and kid’s TV. That sense of propulsion is mirrored in Steven Johnson’s direction and the film’s editing and camerawork: Yolngu Boy’s visual style is wired and caffeinated, with fast edits and lively, somewhat Sam Raimi-esque camera moves. But Johnson and co aren’t being showy for the sake of being showy: that physicality of style mirrors the jittery, hormonal, impatient energy of the protagonists, and it complements rather than distracts from the work of the three leads, from whom Johnson elicits strong performances.
Ultimately, any film of this genre succeeds or fails on the shoulders of its young performers, and the three non-professional actors are terrific. Pilakui conveys conviction and the pull of duty as the ostensible leader of the group; Daniels is cocky but likeable as the football prodigy; and Mununggurr is empathetic and raw as the outsider of the group (think Raphael to Pailakui’s Leonardo and Daniels’ Michaelangelo, to borrow the parlance of our times). The cast also handles the emotional highs and lows of the story well: the ending is substantially heavier than Stand by Me or The Goonies, and the actors deliver. As expected in a non-professional cast, there are some rough edges and there’s some abrasiveness to the performances, but these add authenticity.
A hybrid of adolescent adventure, ancient folklore, and social issues drama, it’s criminal that Yolngu Boy isn’t better known, and that director Johnson hasn’t made more films since. It’s exactly the sort of film that Down Under Flix exists to highlight.
Ben Kooyman

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Innocence (1989)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Director:  Scott Murray Stars:  Katia Caballero, Keith Smith Scott Murray is one of the premier commentators on Australian cinema. He’s best known as editor and contributor to  Cinema Papers  and  Senses of Cinema , as well as for editing, authoring, and contributing to various volumes on Australian film, including one particularly indispensable resource for my work on Down Under Flix,  Australian Film 1978–1994 . In the 1980s, Murray directed the film  Beyond Innocence , also known as  Devil in the Flesh . It was both his theatrical feature debut and swansong, though he’d later helm a music documentary,  Massenet: His Life and Music . 

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...