Skip to main content

The Cup (2011)



Published 2016 on Down Under Flix

Director: Simon Wincer
Stars: Stephen Curry, Daniel MacPherson, Brendan Gleeson
Whether you see it as the race that stops the nation or the race that divides the nation (there’s valid argument for both), and whether it’s the gravitational centre of your day, a chance to go all Caligula, or simply background noise, there’s no shaking that the Melbourne Cup’s a big deal. For non-local readers: it’s a major horse racing event (along the lines of the Kentucky Derby or Royal Ascot) that’s been running in Australia for over 150 years. It’s such as big deal that it’s somewhat surprising the Cup hasn’t featured too prominently in local films, though the prohibitive cost of recreating the event is obviously a factor. Crime comedies Horseplay and The Hard Word (both 2002) spring to mind as recent films to feature the event, albeit in a supporting role. Simon Wincer’s 1983 film Phar Lap, about the titular champion race horse, is probably the best-known film to feature the event. It’s fitting, then, that Wincer takes directing reins of 2011’s The Cup
The film is based on the true story of Damien Oliver (played by Stephen Curry), a celebrated jockey hailing from a racing family: his brother Jason (Daniel MacPherson) is also a jockey, as was his father, who died in a riding accident when Damien was a child. In 2002 Damien is hired to ride an Irish champion horse in the Melbourne Cup, under the guidance of trainer Dermot Weld (Brendan Gleeson). But after a tragic accident claims his brother’s life, Damien loses his confidence in the saddle and must reclaim it before race day. You can probably see where this is going… 
I’ll fess up completely to my mercenary decision to schedule this review for Cup week: if this site was actually selling something beyond the curation of local films, you might even call it clickbait. In my defence, I also considered posting a review of Hugh Keays-Byrne’s counter-culture action film Resistance for Guy Fawkes Day, but opted to wait til later. I also considered posting about an Australian horror film for Halloween, but opted not to because, well…

Mercenary scheduling aside, I was curious to see The Cup because director Simon Wincer fascinates me. He directed the Ozploitation gems Snapshot and Harlequin early in his career, and would later direct such prestige projects as Phar LapThe Lighthorsemen, and the miniseries Lonesome Dove, but is best known for generic, populist, straight-down-the-middle fare like Free WillyOperation Dumbo DropThe Phantom, and one of Paul Hogan’s best films (Lightning Jack) and worst (Crocodile Dundee in Los Angeles). Toss in three (!) Tom Selleck Westerns (Quigley Down UnderCrossfire TrailMonte Walsh) and the somewhat inexplicable Harley Davidson and the Marlboro Man, and that’s an eclectic but workmanlike CV.
When I say The Cup is consistent with Wincer’s wider filmography in being efficient, workmanlike filmmaking, I don’t mean that as faint praise or a backhanded compliment. Whilst auteurism is always a sexier proposition, wrestling a coherent vision of any sort onto the screen is no miniscule feat, and Wincer’s been at it for over 35 years. The Cup is solid filmmaking, not to mention handsomely mounted: unlike a lot of other local films, there’s some serious money on screen, as befitting a story that spans continents and major cultural events. The film also features an innately likeable cast doing likeable work: Curry’s a sympathetic lead, MacPherson makes a good impression with limited screentime, and folks like Trish Oliver, Shaun Micalef, Martin Sacks, Lewis Fitz-Gerald, Bill Hunter, and Phar Lap’s own Tom Burlinson round out the ensemble. Plus there’s import Brendan Gleeson who, whilst not necessarily stretched by the material, aces it as he has each and every role since Braveheart.
Befitting its polished package, the film was modestly successful, earning just a hair under 2.75 million dollars locally – no blockbuster, but respectable by Australian film standards – and scraping its way into the ranks of the 100 most successful Australian films at the local box office (one spot below Sirens). On researching the film, I was genuinely surprised to find it received a lukewarm critical reaction, rating only 29 on Rotten Tomatoes’ Tomatometer; truth be told, the film struck me as too innocuous to inspire any kind of animosity.
And yet, there’s no getting around the fact that The Cup is very, very formulaic, erring closely to the classic Hollywood sports film triumph > tragedy > triumph (or riches > rags > riches) formula (see Rocky II and III as exemplars). Of course, it’s based on a true story that already mirrors that trajectory somewhat, and I don’t want to diminish the real-life tragedy or triumph underpinning the story. But Wincer and co-writer Eric O’Keefe hammer the true story so thoroughly into formulaic shape that most plot and emotional beats are telegraphed well in advance, making for a predictable, familiar viewing experience. Moreover, as director, Wincer engineers some moments of blatant (albeit skilful) emotional manipulation. In an interview with Slash Film, he states:
what I look for when I’m editing a film is those moments when all the elements of performance, sound effects, music and cinematography combine to send a shiver up your spine. You really try to get those key moments, you know? … Like the whale [in Free Willy] leaping over the wall. Finding those moments and it’s the sum total of everything that’s come before. It’s about mountains and valleys. Putting a character in a deep valley and then watching them climb out of it and that, to me, is what you have to deliver.
There’s no doubt Wincer has a knack for pinpointing those moments and orchestrating and amplifying them. However, a little restraint can also go a long way. The Cup is slick entertainment from one of Australia’s best populist journeymen, but it’s also thoroughly familiar fare, with a sap streak as wide as Flemington Racecourse.
Ben Kooyman

Popular posts from this blog

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...

John Hargreaves double feature: Hoodwink (1981) and Sky Pirates (1986)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Discounting the film  Blackfellas , in which he plays a minor role as a racist policeman, I’m surprised it’s taken this long to cover any John Hargreaves films on Down Under Flix. A six time AFI Award nominee (including for  Hoodwink ) and triple winner, Hargreaves is one of the best leading men to emerge from the Australian New Wave, and I have particular regard for his work in  Don’s Party,   Long Weekend , and  The Odd Angry Shot . Hargreaves was a natural performer: gifted and charismatic, but not unnecessarily flashy; handsome, but not movie star handsome, and slightly crumpled like a creased jacket. He was a quintessential Australian everyman ala Jack Thompson and Bryan Brown, though he’s less familiar to young filmgoers today, partly due to his untimely passing in 1996 at age 50. This article looks at one of Hargreaves’ best films… and one of his other films…