Skip to main content

The Diaries of Vaslav Nijinsky (2001)



Published 2016 on Down Under Flix

Director: Paul Cox
Stars: Derek Jacobi (narrator), Leigh Warren & Dancers (dancers)
As Mario Andreacchio’s Gauguin biopic Paradise Found attests, the lives and work of international artists are not beyond the purview of Australian filmmakers. In 1987, Paul Cox directed an acclaimed documentary about painter Vincent Van Gogh, titled Vincent, which featured narration of the artist’s letters by John Hurt. In 2001, Cox released a similar project, The Diaries of Vaslav Nijinsky, trading letters for journals and easels for the stage to chronicle the mental deterioration of another tragic artist, the dancer Vaslav Nijinsky. Derek Jacobi, who also appears in Cox’s film Molokai: The Story of Father Damien, serves as narrator for this feature. 
In the early twentieth century, Nijinsky was one of the world’s premier dancers. Following the outbreak of World War One, his ability to travel the globe performing was severely impeded. Consequently, he suffered a severe mental breakdown and experienced delusions, as chronicled in his diaries. Cox’s film does not dramatize or depict these events per se. Rather, Jacobi narrates Nijinsky’s diary entries over the footage – of nature, of dancers in performance, and of art and archival material – that Cox has assembled to visually symbolise or contrast these spoken words. 
With this review, the late Paul Cox joins Geoffrey Wright and Gillian Armstrong (and next week Rachel Perkins) as directors who’ve had more than one film spotlighted on Down Under Flix. Human Touch, reviewed in the early days of the site and shortly after Cox’s passing, was indicative of Cox’s fondness for the arts and view of their centrality to the human condition, but couched this within a standard screen story. The Diaries of Vaslav Nijinsky is another beast entirely, a passion project three years in the making and many more in gestation that does not come in readily palatable form. It’s neither narrative film nor dramatization – there is one of those out there, Herbert Ross’s Nijinsky with Alan Bates and George De La Pena – but nor is it a documentary. It is, simply put, the diaries rendered in spoken form with accompanying visuals and music, akin to something you might expect to view in a world class art gallery or museum. Cox himself aptly described it as a “cinematic poem” (see here).
Much like a poem, the finished product was the fruit of much solitary work. Whilst there were plenty of collaborators – including Jacobi, composer Paul Grabowsky, Adelaide-based dance troupe Leigh Warren & Dancers – Cox stated that he “made this film in the editing room” (see here). This is evident from the finished product, both in the way it assembles disparate footage and in its somewhat insular feel. Cox’s fascination with his subject is strongly felt, if not necessarily transparent to the audience. Viewers unfamiliar with Nijinsky’s work and with little sense of his accomplishments are, after a fleeting passage of introductory text, thrust directly into and bound to Nijinsky’s point of view for the remainder of the film. One is reminded of the documentarians played by Woody Allen in Crimes and Misdemeanors and Ben Stiller in While We’re Young, who become infatuated with the philosophical/intellectual figures at the core of their passion projects and are unable to wrestle them to completion.
And yet Cox does have a handle on his subject, and the shortcoming perceived above – that for Cox, Nijinsky’s text is all and context is naught – could equally be considered a strength. In its rendition and recreation of Nijinsky’s journals, The Diaries of Vaslav Nijinsky is celebratory but also funereal, a work of mourning. Gradually it dawns upon the viewer (or at least this not-too-clued-in viewer) that Nijinsky is a deeply unreliable narrator – with many of his philosophies, attitudes, and fantasies being of the diseased mind variety – and the words and their accompanying images gradually become more unsettling. Much of the imagery is, admittedly, standard documentary filler (e.g. nature shots), but the dance sequences by Leigh Warren and Dancers are great: alternately entrancing, erotic, disturbing, and bizarre, sometimes within the space of a single performance.
Though I’d recommend the film, I do so with caveats. The Diaries of Vaslav Nijinsky is a hard work to warm to. It’s a very particular flavour of film, one without the usual reliable crutches to rest upon (i.e. narrative arcs and clearly delineated protagonists for feature films; concrete facts and incidents for documentaries), so the viewer has to rise to the occasion, much as one would reading Ulysses or The Waste Land. At times I was thoroughly ill-equipped for the task. But ultimately, the film is worthwhile: it’s a small film, but also a deeply felt, truly personal undertaking by its director, a portrait of one artist by another with a tangible, consuming, almost painful investment in its subject.
Ben Kooyman

Popular posts from this blog

Beyond Innocence (1989)

Published 2017 on Down Under Flix Director:  Scott Murray Stars:  Katia Caballero, Keith Smith Scott Murray is one of the premier commentators on Australian cinema. He’s best known as editor and contributor to  Cinema Papers  and  Senses of Cinema , as well as for editing, authoring, and contributing to various volumes on Australian film, including one particularly indispensable resource for my work on Down Under Flix,  Australian Film 1978–1994 . In the 1980s, Murray directed the film  Beyond Innocence , also known as  Devil in the Flesh . It was both his theatrical feature debut and swansong, though he’d later helm a music documentary,  Massenet: His Life and Music . 

Six pack: Furiosa (2024), Force of Nature (2024), No Escape (1994), The New Boy (2023), Mary and Max (2009), and Sweet As (2022)

  There used to be a nerdy adage—at least until contrary instalments countered the point—that even-numbered Star Trek films were better than their odd-numbered counterparts. I wouldn’t be surprised if a similar adage emerges about the Mad Max films: while the obviously odd-numbered original was a trailblazer, it’s The Road Warrior and Fury Road that have commanded universal acclaim, while Beyond Thunderdome and Furiosa: A Mad Max Saga (2024) have proven divisive. There are striking moments—as expected in both a George Miller film and a Mad Max film—in Furiosa , and Miller remains the most idiosyncratic generator of sequels: Furiosa (technically a prequel) is his sixth, after a Babe sequel, a Happy Feet sequel, and three other Mad Max sequels, with none of these offshoots feeling the same. However, if you’d told me Furiosa was based on a five-part prequel comic book series, I’d believe you, based on its chapter structure and the narrative dead end it arrives at. As it stand...

Malcolm (1986)

  When penning my review of Black and White , starring Robert Carlyle, I was reminded of my two theatrical viewings of The Full Monty : one in a packed theatre with patrons lapping up the film, the other a few weeks later in a large theatre with less than a dozen, far more polite punters. As a dumb teen, I took away the wrong lesson: that the film didn’t work/wasn’t successful outside a packed auditorium. As an adult, I have a more rounded appreciation of the film and its grace notes that aren't dependent on an enthused opening weekend crowd — the thoughtful, non-condescending working-class milieu it sketches (much more effective and less caricatured than the likes of Billy Elliot ), the lovely work from Lesley Sharp, and so on—but the two distinct viewings remain an instructive lesson in the role of an audience in galvanizing each other and collectively elevating a film experience [1]. Malcolm (1986) is a film I’ve also watched twice—albeit at home and with a much longer interva...